
To the cheers of social conservatives and MAGA, the American Virtual Academy is shaking up the education system by rejecting woke ideology and embracing traditional American principles.
At a Glance
- The American Virtual Academy (AVA) rejects woke ideology, focusing on American principles.
- AVA provides an online K-12 education model, offering an alternative to traditional schools.
- The school is accessible nationwide, with tuition assistance available in eight states.
- AVA plans to expand from 600 to 10,000 students in the next three years.
A New Educational Frontier
The American Virtual Academy (AVA), a fully online K-12 preparatory school launched in April 2025, is making waves in the education sector by rejecting what it calls “woke ideology.”
This includes topics like diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), critical race theory (CRT), and transgender issues. AVA positions itself as an alternative to traditional public and private education systems, focusing instead on “American principles” and core academic subjects such as reading, writing, and mathematics.
This move comes in response to a growing number of parents seeking more control over their children’s education, especially following the disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
AVA’s online model is part of a broader trend in U.S. education that has emerged since the pandemic. With a surge in homeschooling and alternative education models, parents are increasingly dissatisfied with perceived liberal or progressive ideologies in public education.
This dissatisfaction has fueled the school choice movement, leading to a proliferation of online and private schooling options. Cognia accredits the AVA and offers NCAA- and NAIA-approved courses, making it a viable choice for families seeking an education that aligns with their values.
Key Stakeholders and Dynamics
The driving force behind AVA is Damian Creamer, the school’s president and founder. Creamer has been vocal about the school’s mission to offer an alternative for families “fed up with liberal ideology” in schools. AVA markets itself as a “safe environment where core American values are respected,” emphasizing flexibility, support for diverse student needs, and advanced learning opportunities. Parents and families are key stakeholders, as their demand drives the school’s offerings. State governments also play a crucial role by enabling school choice and voucher programs, which make AVA financially accessible to more families.
The power dynamics in this scenario highlight the influence of AVA’s leadership in directing curriculum and messaging. State governments’ legislation determines access to funding, while parental demand is the primary market driver. As AVA grows, it may influence public debate and policy, especially concerning school choice and curriculum content.
Current Developments and Impact
Since its launch, AVA has enrolled 600 students, with plans to expand to 10,000 in the next three years. The school is accessible nationwide, with tuition assistance available through vouchers or scholarships in states like Alabama, Arizona, and Tennessee. AVA’s curriculum, developed in partnership with StrongMind, focuses on “American founding principles” while excluding DEI, CRT, and transgender topics. This approach has attracted attention and sparked debate over the role of ideology in education.
In the short term, AVA provides an immediate alternative for families seeking conservative or traditional educational values. For students, it provides a flexible, online learning environment accredited and focused on traditional academics. However, public schools may face challenges as enrollment and funding decline with more families opting for private online alternatives. In the long term, the growth of ideologically driven schools like AVA may further polarize the education sector, leading to increased segmentation along political and cultural lines.
Broader Implications and Perspectives
The rise of AVA and similar schools reflects a shift toward parental control and ideological alignment in K-12 education, driven by policy changes and technological advances. While AVA’s model is economically accessible due to state vouchers, it may also divert resources from public schools. Socially, the exclusion of DEI, CRT, and transgender topics appeals to some families but raises concerns about inclusivity and representation.
Politically, AVA’s growth is closely tied to debates over parental rights, curriculum content, and the government’s role in education. Critics argue that schools like AVA may undermine diversity and inclusion efforts, resulting in educational environments that lack exposure to a broad range of perspectives. However, supporters emphasize parental rights, academic rigor, and alignment with traditional values as key benefits of AVA’s approach.






















